Hi Abigail. Good question. Yes, there is a part 2. I just need to work out what I can say beyond "we need to be the better 'Drs of the Economy' than our opponents" or something.
I feel there's an obvious argument to make about ethos / authoratitoveness / expertise. But I worry there's pitfalls here too in a context of culture war where progressives who emphasize their expertise are easily caricatured as our of touch, over earnest elites looking to nanny "ordinary people".
Hi Abigail. Good question. Yes, there is a part 2. I just need to work out what I can say beyond "we need to be the better 'Drs of the Economy' than our opponents" or something.
I feel there's an obvious argument to make about ethos / authoratitoveness / expertise. But I worry there's pitfalls here too in a context of culture war where progressives who emphasize their expertise are easily caricatured as our of touch, over earnest elites looking to nanny "ordinary people".
Any ideas?
Is there a part two to this? I would love ideas about using these metaphors for good!